<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.upfold.org.uk/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Peter Upfold</title>
	
	<link>http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog</link>
	<description>My personal site and blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:59:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.upfold.org.uk/PeterUpfoldComments" /><feedburner:info uri="peterupfoldcomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /><meta xmlns="http://pipes.yahoo.com" name="pipes" content="noprocess" /><item>
		<title>Comment on SRWare Iron — A Google Chrome Alternative by Choose Wisely — Pick Default Browser on a Per-Link Basis « Blog « Peter Upfold</title>
		<link>http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/2010/02/10/srware-iron/comment-page-1/#comment-132263</link>
		<dc:creator>Choose Wisely — Pick Default Browser on a Per-Link Basis « Blog « Peter Upfold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/?p=905#comment-132263</guid>
		<description>[...] default browser that I use. I use both Firefox and Safari as my primary browsers (and I throw SRWare Iron into the mix sometimes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] default browser that I use. I use both Firefox and Safari as my primary browsers (and I throw SRWare Iron into the mix sometimes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Teaching Computer Security to Non-Geeks by Peter</title>
		<link>http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/2009/11/08/on-teaching-computer-security-to-non-geeks/comment-page-1/#comment-132262</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/?p=797#comment-132262</guid>
		<description>peter nelson,

I think the best defence against getting a PC 'zombied' is to install as little software as possible on it (only trusted software from trusted sources), keep it up-to-date and to avoid accessing anything you don't trust. Once some bad software is on your machine, it's essentially game over. Yes, a software firewall at that point &lt;em&gt;might&lt;/em&gt; be able to prevent other machines getting infected, but it really is too late.

But having said that, I accept that this is an 'ideal world' sort of scenario I'm asking for. In the real world, with non-technical users, it might be difficult to enforce those conditions.

I personally tend to rely on the built-in Windows Firewall on the Windows machines that I run and are responsible for, in combination with a firewall at the router level. Again, though, I make sure those machines don't do anything 'dodgy', so I trust the software installed there.

So to actually answer your question - I'm not really looking at that type of product for the stuff I do, so I'm not sure what to recommend. &lt;a href="http://lifehacker.com/5061933/five-best-windows-firewalls" rel="nofollow"&gt;This list of recommended firewalls at Lifehacker&lt;/a&gt; might be something to look at, though. Again, as I say, I haven't looked at this type of product, so I can't personally vouch for any of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>peter nelson,</p>
<p>I think the best defence against getting a PC &#8216;zombied&#8217; is to install as little software as possible on it (only trusted software from trusted sources), keep it up-to-date and to avoid accessing anything you don&#8217;t trust. Once some bad software is on your machine, it&#8217;s essentially game over. Yes, a software firewall at that point <em>might</em> be able to prevent other machines getting infected, but it really is too late.</p>
<p>But having said that, I accept that this is an &#8216;ideal world&#8217; sort of scenario I&#8217;m asking for. In the real world, with non-technical users, it might be difficult to enforce those conditions.</p>
<p>I personally tend to rely on the built-in Windows Firewall on the Windows machines that I run and are responsible for, in combination with a firewall at the router level. Again, though, I make sure those machines don&#8217;t do anything &#8216;dodgy&#8217;, so I trust the software installed there.</p>
<p>So to actually answer your question &#8211; I&#8217;m not really looking at that type of product for the stuff I do, so I&#8217;m not sure what to recommend. <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5061933/five-best-windows-firewalls" rel="nofollow">This list of recommended firewalls at Lifehacker</a> might be something to look at, though. Again, as I say, I haven&#8217;t looked at this type of product, so I can&#8217;t personally vouch for any of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Teaching Computer Security to Non-Geeks by peter nelson</title>
		<link>http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/2009/11/08/on-teaching-computer-security-to-non-geeks/comment-page-1/#comment-132260</link>
		<dc:creator>peter nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/?p=797#comment-132260</guid>
		<description>What is a good firewall for non-geeks?   - especially one that blocks OUTgoing content to prevent your PC being zombied?

I recently installed Zone Alarm and ran into problems with some apps not working unless I turned off Zone Alarm, but also not logging anything in ZA's log!   I started a couple of threads on their discussion forum that turned real geeky, real fast!    Unless I'm willing to talk ports and filtering that's a no-starter!

But non-geeks can't talk ports and filtering.   

The biggest problem in PC's today is that security software like malware-/virus- checkers and firewalls STILL require too much geekiness for Aunt Martha and Uncle Ned, so they don't do them, and thus there are vast armies of zombied PC's speading trouble!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is a good firewall for non-geeks?   &#8211; especially one that blocks OUTgoing content to prevent your PC being zombied?</p>
<p>I recently installed Zone Alarm and ran into problems with some apps not working unless I turned off Zone Alarm, but also not logging anything in ZA&#8217;s log!   I started a couple of threads on their discussion forum that turned real geeky, real fast!    Unless I&#8217;m willing to talk ports and filtering that&#8217;s a no-starter!</p>
<p>But non-geeks can&#8217;t talk ports and filtering.   </p>
<p>The biggest problem in PC&#8217;s today is that security software like malware-/virus- checkers and firewalls STILL require too much geekiness for Aunt Martha and Uncle Ned, so they don&#8217;t do them, and thus there are vast armies of zombied PC&#8217;s speading trouble!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Set Up Public Key Authentication for SSH on the Mac by Michael</title>
		<link>http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/2009/09/11/set-up-public-key-authentication-for-ssh-on-the-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-132253</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/?p=767#comment-132253</guid>
		<description>Peter,

Thanks for the great tutorial!! Your youtube video helped me out alot.

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>Thanks for the great tutorial!! Your youtube video helped me out alot.</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Rant on the ‘Ribbon’ by Sam Boswell</title>
		<link>http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/2009/11/19/my-rant-on-the-ribbon/comment-page-1/#comment-132250</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Boswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/?p=820#comment-132250</guid>
		<description>True - but users fresh to the system that I've seen pick it up a lot faster than old office interface. The people who struggle most I think, are more hardcore users, who knew where *everything* was, and now feel a little cheated that the effort gone into learning a system has gone out the window a little?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True &#8211; but users fresh to the system that I&#8217;ve seen pick it up a lot faster than old office interface. The people who struggle most I think, are more hardcore users, who knew where *everything* was, and now feel a little cheated that the effort gone into learning a system has gone out the window a little?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Rant on the ‘Ribbon’ by Peter</title>
		<link>http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/2009/11/19/my-rant-on-the-ribbon/comment-page-1/#comment-132248</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/?p=820#comment-132248</guid>
		<description>I have to admit to not having used the Ribbon or Office 2007/2010 extensively. I would get used to it with exposure and pick it up, like any other UI change.

You say the ribbon is useful to you - but it is that much more useful than the existing menu structure where you probably knew roughly where everything you needed was? Is it really worth the massive overhaul for something that is merely useful and doesn't seem to provide you massive benefit?

The other key issue is that many less techie users find themselves needing retraining to use the new interface - and this can be extremely frustrating, particularly if they are switching between machines using the old UI and the new UI, or only just became comfortable with the old system!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit to not having used the Ribbon or Office 2007/2010 extensively. I would get used to it with exposure and pick it up, like any other UI change.</p>
<p>You say the ribbon is useful to you &#8211; but it is that much more useful than the existing menu structure where you probably knew roughly where everything you needed was? Is it really worth the massive overhaul for something that is merely useful and doesn&#8217;t seem to provide you massive benefit?</p>
<p>The other key issue is that many less techie users find themselves needing retraining to use the new interface &#8211; and this can be extremely frustrating, particularly if they are switching between machines using the old UI and the new UI, or only just became comfortable with the old system!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Rant on the ‘Ribbon’ by Sam Boswell</title>
		<link>http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/2009/11/19/my-rant-on-the-ribbon/comment-page-1/#comment-132247</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Boswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/?p=820#comment-132247</guid>
		<description>I have to say - I use office 2007 on a pretty regular basis, and I do find the ribbon useful, and pretty nice to use.
However office 2010 - is fugly :p I hate the massive "File Menu" drop down, in 2007, it was the big ball in the top left, now when you click it - it fills the screen. office 2007 was good, and worked well, and still does. 2010 makes me want to set Rachel McCrindle onto the developers :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say &#8211; I use office 2007 on a pretty regular basis, and I do find the ribbon useful, and pretty nice to use.<br />
However office 2010 &#8211; is fugly :p I hate the massive &#8220;File Menu&#8221; drop down, in 2007, it was the big ball in the top left, now when you click it &#8211; it fills the screen. office 2007 was good, and worked well, and still does. 2010 makes me want to set Rachel McCrindle onto the developers :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DfontSplitter — Solution to Windows Corrupt Font Error by Peter</title>
		<link>http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/2009/08/23/dfontsplitter-solution-to-windows-corrupt-font-error/comment-page-1/#comment-132243</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/?p=744#comment-132243</guid>
		<description>Fiya,

I've had the same problem you describe with Helvetica Bold on Windows. Helvetica and Oblique work fine, but when you try to make some Helvetica text bold, it simply turns into Arial.

I don't know what it is about Helvetica Bold and I'm afraid I don't have a solution, but I do have the same issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fiya,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had the same problem you describe with Helvetica Bold on Windows. Helvetica and Oblique work fine, but when you try to make some Helvetica text bold, it simply turns into Arial.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what it is about Helvetica Bold and I&#8217;m afraid I don&#8217;t have a solution, but I do have the same issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DfontSplitter — Solution to Windows Corrupt Font Error by Fiya</title>
		<link>http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/2009/08/23/dfontsplitter-solution-to-windows-corrupt-font-error/comment-page-1/#comment-132242</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/?p=744#comment-132242</guid>
		<description>This was a great solution, so thanks for posting. I was wondering if you had a problem with Helvetica Bold on Windows. For some reason, when I transferred the four versions to the PC, it was just a copy of Helvetica regular. The Oblique and Bold Oblique are fine. When I view it on the Mac, there is a distinct difference between the bold and regular. It is very baffling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a great solution, so thanks for posting. I was wondering if you had a problem with Helvetica Bold on Windows. For some reason, when I transferred the four versions to the PC, it was just a copy of Helvetica regular. The Oblique and Bold Oblique are fine. When I view it on the Mac, there is a distinct difference between the bold and regular. It is very baffling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Three Years of Mac by andjoh (bunga)</title>
		<link>http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/2010/02/22/three-years-of-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-132232</link>
		<dc:creator>andjoh (bunga)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/?p=900#comment-132232</guid>
		<description>Happy 3rd Mac Birthday Peter. I've been using Macs since the beginnings and when I'm on a Windogs machine I get bored easily or I'm fixing it. Saying that shows my love of the Mac and I never got to see OS X anywhere until mum bought Mac Mini with Panda installed and only played with it for only 10 minutes or so then quickly used the update Disks to Tiger. So a big jump from Classic Os9 to Tiger more or less. And now loving Leopard and waiting for the day to get an inTel mac for Snow Leopard.

Nice Post ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy 3rd Mac Birthday Peter. I&#8217;ve been using Macs since the beginnings and when I&#8217;m on a Windogs machine I get bored easily or I&#8217;m fixing it. Saying that shows my love of the Mac and I never got to see OS X anywhere until mum bought Mac Mini with Panda installed and only played with it for only 10 minutes or so then quickly used the update Disks to Tiger. So a big jump from Classic Os9 to Tiger more or less. And now loving Leopard and waiting for the day to get an inTel mac for Snow Leopard.</p>
<p>Nice Post <img src='http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
